One bar. Written down first.
The interview is built from the role, and every answer is scored against a rubric written before anybody applied.
- The interview is derived from the role, not from a library someone liked.
- Answers scored on evidence, with the quote attached.
- Vague criteria like culture fit are thrown out before anything is ranked.
how the system behaves, not a benchmark
Interviews Designed for Fairness.
Great interviews do not happen by chance, they are structured. The rubric is written from the role before anybody applies, so the standard cannot drift as the day wears on. Scores come with the evidence attached, which means you can argue with them.
The Bar Is Set In Advance
Every question arrives with its criteria already written. Nobody gets an easier run for interviewing late on a Friday.
Criteria That Survive Scrutiny
Your ranking criteria are checked before they count. Vague soft traits are rejected outright, so the ranking rests on what a candidate demonstrably did.
How the interview gets built.
- 01The role is read first
The job description is turned into the skills and tools the role actually needs, before a single question exists. The interview is derived from the job, not from a library of questions someone liked.
- 02Sections, then questions
An opening round to settle in, a middle round where material appears on screen and gets discussed aloud, and a closing round. Roles that call for it also get a walkthrough of the candidate’s own resume, a whiteboard, a coding section, or a mock sales call.
- 03Every question arrives with its rubric
Two to four named criteria, the signals a strong answer contains, and a time budget. All of it written once, before anybody sat down, so the standard cannot drift as you get tired of reading.
- 04The rubric does not move once the interview starts
Criteria are fixed before anybody sits down, so an answer is judged against the standard the role asked for rather than against the last person you spoke to.
How an answer gets scored.
- 1 to 5Per answer, against that question’s rubric
Each named criterion is scored separately, and a quote from the answer is attached to the score. You are never asked to trust a number on its own.
- 0 to 100For the interview as a whole
Average quality, weighted by how much of the interview was actually reached.
- 50For a question never reached
Unanswered is not zero. A short interview reads as inconclusive and leans back on the paper, rather than being scored as a failure.
- -1Only when slow and wrong
Running long costs a point only past one and a half times the budget, and only when the answer was weak anyway. Thinking slowly is not the same as not knowing.
The room, and what watches it.
Interview integrity is off by default and turned on per organisation or per role. When it is on, the candidate is told exactly what is watched before they agree to anything, and the session is recorded with that stated up front.
- advisoryRecorded, never blocking
More than one face, no face at all, where the eyes are pointed, framing, a phone in shot, a tab switch, a second monitor. All of it is logged for you to look at. None of it stops the interview or touches a score.
- blockingThe Guard app, on the candidate’s own machine
It watches the operating system for windows deliberately hidden from screen capture, for screenshots, and for capture permissions being granted mid-session. If it is not paired, has gone quiet, or has seen something strong, the room does not open.
- neverA signal that changes a score
Nothing the proctor sees feeds any number. Blocking a room is not rejecting a person, and the decision stays with you either way.
What it will not do.
- It will not rewrite the rubric after reading an answer.
- It will not score culture fit, leadership, ownership or go-getter. The criteria validator rejects them before ranking starts.
- It will not put a human in the room. You watch the recording afterwards, at speed, with the transcript beside it.
- It will not let a proctoring flag move a score, or reject anybody on its own.
“I particularly appreciate the AI bot that handles initial candidate interaction. It serves as an effective first line of engagement, and the detailed, evaluation-backed rankings bring a new layer of trust to every hiring decision, something traditional ATSs often miss.”
Kusum Rajput · Human Resource Associate