process 01Smarter ScreeningRead and score every application, not just the top of the pile. 02Better ShortlistingRank on twenty signals, with the evidence behind each one. 03Faster SchedulingNo calendars, no slots. One link, good for fourteen hours. 04Fairer InterviewsQuestions built from the role, answers scored against a written rubric.
Pricing
use cases 01Resume VerificationEvery claim read in context, not lifted out as a keyword. 02AI Cheating PreventionBuilt for the copilot era: divided attention, novel questions. 03Volume ScreeningThe same rubric for applicant one and applicant a thousand. 04Pre-BGV FilterA consistency check before formal verification spend.
For candidates For investors Join waitlist
process · 04

One bar. Written down first.

The interview is built from the role, and every answer is scored against a rubric written before anybody applied.

2-4named criteria behind every question
15-18questions in a typical interview
0rubrics written after a candidate answered

how the system behaves, not a benchmark

Interviews Designed for Fairness.

Great interviews do not happen by chance, they are structured. The rubric is written from the role before anybody applies, so the standard cannot drift as the day wears on. Scores come with the evidence attached, which means you can argue with them.

The Bar Is Set In Advance

Every question arrives with its criteria already written. Nobody gets an easier run for interviewing late on a Friday.

Criteria That Survive Scrutiny

Your ranking criteria are checked before they count. Vague soft traits are rejected outright, so the ranking rests on what a candidate demonstrably did.

How the interview gets built.

How an answer gets scored.

The room, and what watches it.

Interview integrity is off by default and turned on per organisation or per role. When it is on, the candidate is told exactly what is watched before they agree to anything, and the session is recorded with that stated up front.

What it will not do.

“I particularly appreciate the AI bot that handles initial candidate interaction. It serves as an effective first line of engagement, and the detailed, evaluation-backed rankings bring a new layer of trust to every hiring decision, something traditional ATSs often miss.”

Kusum Rajput · Human Resource Associate