process 01Smarter ScreeningRead and score every application, not just the top of the pile. 02Better ShortlistingRank on twenty signals, with the evidence behind each one. 03Faster SchedulingNo calendars, no slots. One link, good for fourteen hours. 04Fairer InterviewsQuestions built from the role, answers scored against a written rubric.
Pricing
use cases 01Resume VerificationEvery claim read in context, not lifted out as a keyword. 02AI Cheating PreventionBuilt for the copilot era: divided attention, novel questions. 03Volume ScreeningThe same rubric for applicant one and applicant a thousand. 04Pre-BGV FilterA consistency check before formal verification spend.
For candidates For investors Candidate login Employer login Get access →
costs

How Much Does AI Interviewing Cost in India? Per Candidate and Per Role

AgentR charges ₹25 per applicant reviewed and ₹10 per interview minute, so a typical role costs about ₹10,000. Here is the arithmetic and where it stops holding.

At AgentR's list price as of October 2026, screening and interviewing cost ₹25 per applicant reviewed plus ₹10 per interview minute, before GST. A role with 100 applicants and 25 thirty-minute interviews comes to ₹10,000, or ₹400 per candidate interviewed. Other vendors price in other units, so compare cost per role.

AI interview pricing is quoted in at least four different units: per interview, per credit, per seat and per annual contract. A "₹500 per candidate" line and a "₹11,999 a month" line cannot be compared until both are turned into the same thing. The most useful common unit for an agency or a hiring team is the cost of one role, from first applicant to a shortlist a person can read.

This page does that arithmetic for AgentR, shows what sits outside the quoted price, and lists what to ask any vendor so their number lands in the same unit.

What does AI interviewing cost per candidate in India?

It depends on the unit the vendor charges in, which is why quoted figures for the same service differ so widely. A per-interview price covers only the people who reach the interview. A subscription covers a volume you have to guess in advance. A usage meter charges for everything that enters the system, including people who never clear your bar.

The only comparison that holds across all three is total spend on one role divided by the number of candidates you end up with. For a staffing agency that is the cost of a shortlist. For an IT company it is the cost of a first-round pool. The rest of this page works in those units.

How is AgentR priced, and what does one role cost?

AgentR has one plan, and every figure below comes from its pricing page as of October 2026. The plan costs ₹11,999 a month and buys ₹12,000 of usage balance. Usage is drawn from that balance at ₹25 per applicant reviewed and ₹10 per interview minute. All prices exclude GST.

Verification, proctoring, interview questions, seats and candidate search are ₹0 on every account. Unused balance rolls over for six months. You see an estimated cost before a role goes live and can set a spend cap per role.

The reference role. The page sizes the plan as about one role, 100 applicants and 25 interviews. At a 30-minute interview that is ₹2,500 for review (100 × ₹25) plus ₹7,500 for interviews (25 × 30 × ₹10), so ₹10,000 in total, inside the ₹12,000 balance.

Interview length changes the total more than anything else. The same role with 20-minute interviews costs ₹7,500 (₹2,500 plus ₹5,000). With 45-minute interviews it costs ₹13,750 (₹2,500 plus ₹11,250), which is ₹1,750 more than one plan's balance.

Applicant count changes it next. A role that pulls 300 applicants and interviews 40 people for 30 minutes costs ₹19,500 (₹7,500 plus ₹12,000). Every reviewed applicant is charged, including the ones who do not clear your bar.

What does it work out to per applicant, per interview and per shortlist?

On the reference role, one applicant costs ₹100 all-in, one interviewed candidate costs ₹400 all-in, and one candidate on a ten-person shortlist costs ₹1,000. Those three numbers are the same ₹10,000 divided by 100, 25 and 10.

  • Per applicant reviewed: ₹100 (₹10,000 ÷ 100). The direct charge is ₹25. The other ₹75 is the interview spend spread across everyone who applied.
  • Per candidate interviewed: ₹400 (₹10,000 ÷ 25). The direct interview charge is ₹300 for 30 minutes.
  • Per candidate on a ten-person shortlist: ₹1,000 (₹10,000 ÷ 10). This is the figure an agency can set against what a client pays for a submission.

For the free first role, the pricing page gives up to 50 applicants reviewed and 5 interviews, verified and proctored, with no card required. At list rates that is ₹1,250 of review (50 × ₹25) before interviews.

What does a staffing agency pay across a month?

Five roles of the reference size cost ₹50,000 of usage in a month, which is just over four plans' worth of balance. That is ₹10,000 per role, ₹1,000 per ten-person shortlist, and a bill that moves with the number of roles you open rather than with the number of consultants.

The pricing page points anyone running eight or more roles a month to a custom volume plan, and says volume discounts and a dedicated rate for DPIIT-recognised startups are available on request. We have not published what those rates are, so treat the ₹10,000 figure as a list-price reference, not a quote.

Consultants still read the shortlist. The meter pays for the first pass over every application and the structured interview, and a person decides who goes to the client. If you are weighing the agency case in detail, how to verify candidate claims before client submission covers what a submission note should carry.

Which costs are not on the price page?

Five things fall outside the quoted price, and each one changes the real cost of a role: GST, the consultant's time on the shortlist, human interviews of the finalists, formal background verification, and overrun from longer interviews. None of them is hidden. They are simply not in the headline number.

GST is added on top, because the page states that all prices exclude it. Reading the shortlist takes a person's time, and AgentR does not replace that. Finalist interviews with the client or hiring manager still happen. Background verification comes later, after an offer, and is a separate paid check; AgentR's verification checks a candidate's claims for consistency against public and organisational signals, does not contact employers or institutions, and does not produce BGV-equivalent output. Overrun happens when you choose 45-minute interviews for a role you sized at 30, as the arithmetic above shows.

For scale, hiring itself is not cheap on the human side. SHRM's benchmarking put the average cost per hire at nearly $4,700 in the US, as reported in April 2022. That figure covers the whole hiring process, not only screening, and it is a US number. It is a reminder that the screening line is one of several.

What should you compare across AI interview vendors?

Ask every vendor for the same five things, in writing, and convert each answer into the cost of one role. Pricing pages we read while preparing this page use per-interview, per-credit, per-seat and annual-contract models, so a headline price alone tells you very little.

  • The unit. What exactly is charged: each interview started, each interview completed, each applicant, each seat? Is a no-show billed?
  • What is inside the unit. Are proctoring, verification, questions and candidate search included, or are they add-ons?
  • What happens to unused balance. Does it roll over, and for how long? Can you get a refund on usage you paid for but did not use?
  • Controls. Can you see an estimate before a role goes live and cap spend per role?
  • The tax line. Are quoted prices inclusive or exclusive of GST?

On those five, AgentR's published answers are: usage-metered per applicant and per interview minute, no-show billing at ₹0, verification and proctoring at ₹0, six-month rollover with refund of unused paid balance on request, a pre-launch estimate with a per-role spend cap, and prices exclusive of GST. The pricing page also says that if the hire was not in the ten-person shortlist, the role's screening cost is refunded. AgentR has no outcome data to show yet, so read that as a refund term only, with no performance claim attached.

When is AgentR not the cheaper option?

Three cases point away from it. If you screen a handful of CVs for one role now and then, a general chat assistant costs less and may be enough: a staffing agency can use ChatGPT for a small batch, and the gap opens when you need repeatable scoring and a trail a client can read.

If almost every applicant is a poor fit, a pure per-applicant meter charges you to read people you would have ruled out in a minute, so a cheap human pre-filter before upload can lower the bill. And if you need a fixed annual cost for budgeting, a usage meter moves with volume by design, so you would ask for the custom plan.

For campus-scale volume the same arithmetic scales up quickly, which is worked through in running first rounds for thousands of freshers.

Questions people ask

What hidden costs should I watch for in AI interviews?

Look at what sits outside the headline unit: tax, longer interview slots, add-on proctoring or verification, and the human time spent reading the output. Ask for a per-role total, with GST, for a role the size of yours.

How do monthly plans compare with per-interview pricing?

A per-interview price charges only for interviews held, while a monthly plan charges for a volume you commit to. Convert both to the cost of one role at your usual applicant and interview counts, and the comparison becomes plain.

How many AI interviews do I need per hire?

It depends on the role and the vendor's process, and no number holds across all of them. Size the role from your own history: applicants received, people you would interview, and the shortlist size a client or manager expects. AgentR's reference sizing is 100 applicants, 25 interviews and a ten-person shortlist.

What AgentR does for this problem, and what it does not

AgentR reads every application in full, checks claims against the public record, runs structured interviews scored against a rubric written before anyone applied, and hands the team a ranked shortlist with evidence attached. The pricing above is how that work is metered, and the pricing page is the source of truth where it differs from this one.

It does not auto-reject anyone, and every decision stays with a person. Its verification is not background verification. It is in private beta, so there is no customer base to point to and no outcome figures to quote. If you want to see how a shortlist is built before you price anything, how AgentR shortlists candidates shows the output.

Run your next open role through AgentR. The first one is on us.

See the cost estimate for your own role on the pricing page.